Private Beta — Limited Firm Access

Get to the number
with confidence.

The modern framework for consistent, defensible case valuation.

CLARC helps litigation teams evaluate damages, research comparable outcomes, document valuation decisions, and generate professional reports so every demand starts with confidence.

Try a live case below — no account required. Request early access when you’re ready.

CLARCBeta
attorney@clarc.legal
Confidential ON
Sign out
BetaCLARC is in early access. Please verify all estimates independently before use.
DashboardCLARC-2026-0142Results
CLARC-2026-0142
Personal Injury  ·  Ohio  ·  Auto Accident
Strong Liability
Edit
Settlement Range
$280,000$420,000
Opening Demand
$525,000
Confidence Score
82%
Comparative Fault
0%
Economic Damages
Medical Expenses$48,500
Lost Wages$31,200
Future Income Loss$65,000
Out-of-Pocket$4,200
Total Economic$148,900
Non-Economic
$198K – $280K
Pain & suffering · Impairment · Quality of life
Documented PainFuture ImpairmentNo Prior Injury
Comparable Cases
OH-2024-0341High
$312,000
OH-2023-1187Moderate
$187,500
Firm-2022-044High
$412,000
Generate Report
Case Intelligence
Designed for forward-thinking litigation teams looking to replace spreadsheets with a standardized framework for case valuation.
Personal InjuryEmployment LawCivil RightsMedical MalpracticeMass Tort
About CLARC

Case valuation software
built for plaintiff attorneys.

CLARC(Case Litigation Assessment & Resolution Calculator) is a structured case valuation platform for plaintiff litigation attorneys. It calculates economic and non-economic damages, surfaces comparable verdicts and settlements, and generates professional demand reports — replacing ad-hoc spreadsheets with a defensible, firm-wide methodology.

CLARC supports Personal Injury, Employment, Civil Rights, Medical Malpractice, and Defamation practices across US jurisdictions. It is currently in private beta.

Full platform overview →
Who it serves
Plaintiff litigation attorneys and firms — personal injury, employment, civil rights, medical malpractice, and defamation practices.
Problem it solves
Ad-hoc, inconsistent case valuation based on spreadsheets and individual attorney memory. CLARC creates a shared, repeatable framework with a full documentation trail.
Core outputs
Calibrated settlement range (low / expected / high), opening demand figure, confidence score, non-economic severity breakdown, and comparable case citations.
Research sources
CourtListener (millions of federal and state opinions), firm-specific closed case data, and Westlaw Edge (enterprise). LexisNexis and UniCourt on the roadmap.
Data ownership
Each firm owns its own data. No firm data is shared with other firms or used to train any shared model.
The Problem

Every attorney has experience.

Not every firm has a standard.

Across plaintiff firms of every size, case valuation still relies on spreadsheets, memory, and individual judgment. The result is inconsistent valuations, undocumented decisions, and different answers depending on who evaluates the case.

Old Workflow
📊Excel spreadsheet
📝Yellow legal pad
🗒️Sticky notes
🧠Attorney memory
Result
Different numbers from different attorneys
No documented methodology
Clients receive inconsistent expectations
Settlement strategy becomes subjective
CLARC
With CLARC
Structured assessment
Comparable outcomes
Professional valuation report
Confidence
Every attorney follows the same framework
Every valuation decision is documented
Clients receive consistent, defensible expectations

Your experience shouldn’t live inside one attorney’s head.

Every great attorney develops instincts over years of practice.

But instincts don’t scale.

CLARC turns institutional knowledge into a repeatable valuation framework your entire team can use.

Features

Everything you need to support the number.

Structured Case Assessment

Guide every attorney through the same repeatable framework — from economic damages to non-economic severity scores.

Comparable Verdict Research

Surface relevant published outcomes automatically, ranked by case type, jurisdiction, and severity profile.

Firm Knowledge

Your closed cases become calibration data. CLARC grows more accurate for your practice areas the longer you use it.

Settlement Analysis

Generate calibrated ranges with confidence scoring, liability adjustments, and jurisdiction-specific caps applied automatically.

Professional Reports

Produce polished, attorney-reviewed valuation summaries ready for demand packages or internal review — in minutes.

Case Intelligence

Attorney review notes, research summaries, calibration notes — all documented and searchable in one place per case.

Live Demo

Don’t just read about it.

Value a case yourself.

Maria Delgado v. [Defendant] is preloaded so you can experience CLARC the way your attorneys would. Change the facts, adjust the damages, and watch the valuation update in real time. No account required.

Case Details
Economic Damages
Harm Severity (1–10)
Physical pain
7
Emotional distress
5
Mental health impact
4
Loss of enjoyment
6
Reputational harm
1
Permanence of injury
6
Supporting Factors
Estimated case value
$277,178
Expected  ·  Range $235K$319K
Low
$235,268
Expected
$277,178
High
$319,088
Demand
$398,860
Economic damages
$69,100
Documented losses
Non-economic range
$159,258 – $243,078
Base $50,800 · 2.9x–4.4x
Opening demand
$398,860
25% above high estimate
Confidence score
95
Structured estimate for internal review only. Does not provide legal advice or guarantee outcomes.
Comparable CasesLive
Research Summary
Published Personal Injury outcomes in similar cases ranged from $187,500 to $875,000. The CLARC estimate falls within the comparable range.
Rear-End Collision / Cervical Herniation
High
OH · 2023 · Jury Verdict Reporter
C5-C6 herniation in rear-end collision. Six months physical therapy, partial permanent impairment. Returned to…
Economic
$52,000
Recovery
$187,500
Search similar records →
Slip and Fall / Permanent Knee Injury
High
OH · 2022 · Ohio Courts Statistical Report
Torn ACL and MCL requiring surgery. Permanent 15% impairment. Defendant had prior notice of condition.
Economic
$78,000
Recovery
$235,000
Search similar records →
Auto Accident / Traumatic Brain Injury
Moderate
PA · 2023 · Jury Verdict Reporter
Mild TBI and post-concussion syndrome affecting work performance. Commercial driver defendant.
Economic
$145,000
Recovery
$875,000
Search similar records →
Comparable cases from published verdict reporters and federal court records. Verify all references independently before use in any filing or demand.
Research

Research, Grounded
in Real Data.

Every valuation deserves supporting evidence.
CLARC automatically researches comparable cases, legal authority, and your firm’s own historical outcomes so every valuation begins with reliable information—not assumptions. Every comparable is linked back to its original source so your team can verify the information independently.

Case Intelligence — CLARC-2026-0142
Research Summary
Comparable Cases
Legal Authority
Evidence
Sources
AI Research Summary

Based on comparable Ohio personal injury cases with similar severity profiles, published outcomes range from $187,500 to $412,000. Strong liability indicators and documented future impairment support the upper range.

Strong LiabilityFuture Impairment3 Comparables Found
Comparable Cases
OH-2024-0341High
Personal Injury · Franklin Co.
$312,000
CourtListener
OH-2023-1187Moderate
Auto Accident · Cuyahoga Co.
$187,500
CourtListener
Firm-2022-044High
Premises Liability · OH
$412,000
Firm Data
All results link directly to original sources. Verify before relying.
CourtListenerLive

Millions of published court opinions and federal PACER dockets from the Free Law Project.

Used for case law, procedural history, jurisdiction-specific authority, and legal research.

Firm Outcome DataIncluded

Your firm's own settlements, verdicts, demand letters, and closed matters become private reference points.

Helps create consistency across your practice without exposing data to other firms.

Westlaw EdgeEnterprise

Connect your existing Westlaw subscription to surface verdicts, settlements, KeyCite, and litigation analytics directly inside CLARC.

Bring your existing research subscription into the workflow.

Lexis+Coming Soon

Expanded verdict and settlement research, litigation analytics, and Shepard's citations.

UniCourtComing Soon

Structured state and federal court data with advanced docket and case metadata.

Every research result includes a direct link back to its original source. CLARC summarizes the research to save time, but attorneys remain in control and should independently verify all authorities before relying on them.

Built for the way attorneys actually work.

Instead of switching between spreadsheets, legal research platforms, demand letters, and case files, CLARC brings valuation, research, and firm knowledge together in one workspace.

See Case Intelligence in Action →
How It Works

From intake to demand in five steps.

01

Open a case.

Start a new matter in seconds. Enter client details, case type, and jurisdiction to begin.

02

Assess damages.

Walk through structured intake: economic damages, non-economic severity scores, supporting factors.

03

Research comparable outcomes.

CLARC surfaces relevant published verdicts and settlements, ranked by match quality, automatically.

04

Generate a professional valuation.

Receive a calibrated settlement range, confidence score, attorney notes, and jurisdiction flags.

05

Support settlement strategy.

Export a polished report for internal review or demand package preparation.

Social Proof

Built with attorneys. Refined through real cases.

Helping firms move beyond spreadsheets.

"We've been doing this in Excel for twelve years. The first time I ran CLARC on a real case, I thought — this is exactly what we've been missing."

Future testimonial — Reserved for beta participants

"Every attorney in our firm was reaching different numbers on the same case. CLARC gave us a shared framework for the first time."

Future testimonial — Reserved for beta participants

"The research layer alone is worth it. I used to spend two hours pulling comparable outcomes. CLARC does it in thirty seconds."

Future testimonial — Reserved for beta participants
Why Firms Care

A standardized framework for every case.

Consistency

Every attorney follows the same framework. Whether it's a senior partner or a first-year associate, the process is identical.

Confidence

Document why a valuation was reached. Build a defensible rationale you can stand behind in every negotiation.

Efficiency

Reduce the hours spent preparing demands, researching comparables, and building settlement rationale from scratch.

Institutional Knowledge

Capture what your firm learns over decades. Turn years of attorney experience into a repeatable, scalable process.

The Difference

CLARC vs. the status quo.

Traditional
CLARC
Valuation method
Excel & memory
Structured framework
Comparable research
Hours of manual work
Automatic, ranked results
Process consistency
Varies by attorney
Firm-wide standard
Documentation
None
Full audit trail
Client reporting
Manual, inconsistent
Professional, instant
Knowledge retention
Lost when attorneys leave
Captured in the platform
Private Beta

Help shape the future of case valuation.

We’re inviting a limited number of litigation firms into the private beta. Early participants will have direct input on product direction and receive preferred pricing when CLARC launches publicly.

We’re building CLARC alongside experienced plaintiff attorneys to ensure it reflects how real firms evaluate cases—not how software companies think they should.

FAQ

Common questions.

Get Started

Get to the number with confidence.

Whether you’re evaluating a new case, preparing a demand, or helping a client understand what their case may be worth, CLARC gives your team a structured framework for consistent, defensible case valuation.

Request Early Access